Transformation is now the default condition for growth-focused organisations. Whether driven by rapid digital innovation, continuous AI integration and recalibration, competitive disruption, regulatory shifts or strategic reinvention, modern businesses operate in a near-permanent state of change. For executives, the challenge is maintaining momentum while protecting the wellbeing and capability of their teams. Mastering this balance has become a defining leadership competency.
According to McKinsey, 70% of large-scale transformation programmes fail to deliver their intended value, with behavioural barriers, including resistance, weak sponsorship and inadequate change infrastructure, accounting for much of the shortfall. Bain & Company reports an even more sobering picture: only one in eight transformations meet their original ambition, while most experience some level of value dilution – figures unchanged for two decades.
The human cost is equally stark. In a global survey by Emergn, half of employees reported “transformation fatigue”, and 45% said the associated stress had led to burnout. Crucially, half of those experiencing fatigue had considered leaving their organisation. Failure therefore carries consequences far beyond the project itself—it diminishes trust in leadership and weakens organisational cohesion..
When people are overwhelmed, engagement falls, performance drops and trust erodes. More than half of employees feel that too much change is happening simultaneously, and 71% say they are overwhelmed by the volume of change in their roles. Even those not yet at burnout often show signs of chronic stress, including reduced satisfaction, impaired judgement and lower productivity.
To counter this, organisations must find equilibrium: preventing overwhelm while sustaining progress. When transformation is thoughtfully designed, with realistic targets, clear communication, visible milestones and strategic resource allocation, teams feel supported and energised rather than depleted. Groups that experience collaborative, well-paced cycles of change with intentional peaks and periods of recovery are better able to sustain the relentless rhythm of modern organisational life.
Looking ahead to 2026, several transformation trends are likely to intensify, and with them, the risks of burnout.
Organisations will increasingly use generative AI to underpin decision-making, customer experience and operational processes. While the potential for efficiency is considerable, these shifts require new behaviours, redesigned roles and significant capability uplift. Without strong change leadership, AI initiatives may create confusion, destabilise teams and deepen fatigue. Over half of the employees surveyed in the Emergn research said AI-driven initiatives were increasing transformation fatigue, a sign of companies putting digital transformation in before properly preparing workforces. See our previous insights on AI-powered workforces and Leading in an Era of Agentic Intelligence.
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) imperatives will continue to reshape strategy, requiring greener supply chains, more transparent operations and more rigorous reporting. These changes demand both operational discipline and meaningful cultural evolution, not merely compliance.
Hybrid work has moved from experimentation to optimisation. Organisations will further refine operating models, role expectations, productivity metrics and team structures. Many are encouraging increased in-office presence to reduce silos, strengthen collaboration and intergenerational learning and mentoring. This will create ongoing organisational adjustment, particularly across globally distributed teams.
More organisations will build strategic ecosystems or platform businesses, partnering with technology firms, start-ups and new entrants. These transformations demand new governance new capabilities and new trust mechanisms, adding further layers of complexity.
Collectively, these forces mean 2026 is not simply another year of “large scale project’ transformation, it is likely to be defined by continuous, multi-dimensional transformation.
At the heart of transformation fatigue, executives must consider this psychological truth: humans have a strong preference for stability. Change disrupts mental models, routines and meaning. Sustained disruption accumulates into cognitive overload, diminishing engagement and increasing resistance
Middle managers can be particularly vulnerable. They translate strategic ambition into operational reality without always having the authority, time or clarity to shape the journey. When they become overstretched, entire transformation programmes stall.
Poor sequencing further compounds the strain. Anthosa Research shows that when organisations run more than seven major initiatives concurrently, failure rates climb to 83%. Prosci’s research highlights that frontline functions, Operations, Customer service, Sales, HR, experience the greatest change saturation.
Another common error is overburdening the same high-performers. “Star Players” are too often asked to carry disproportionate weight, leading to burnout and capability loss, while other talent remains underutilised. When organisations fail to manage human resources and capabilities deliberately and strategically, transformation efforts can stall. When too many initiatives run in parallel without deliberate resource management, engagement collapses and leadership sponsorship weakens.
Senior leaders can protect teams, and themselves, from burnout by grounding transformation in a set of disciplined, evidence-based practices.
Begin with a rigorous diagnostic to understand organisational readiness, historical change load and pressure points before moving on to a bold vision. Leading companies (Ford, Adobe, T-Mobile, Virgin Australia) explicitly manage organisational energy from the outset, recognising that it is often the true governor of transformation pace.
Accelerating too fast is a common mistake. McKinsey finds that organisations adopting structured, sequenced transformation actions can more than double their success rates. Build in hybrid phases where old and new systems run in parallel, giving people space to adapt.
Ambiguity is the enemy of transformation. Teams need repeated clarity on the rationale, process, expectations and available support. Recent research shows that only 53% of managers and 40% of employees understood the transformation underway—despite 68% of leaders believing they had communicated clearly.
Employees expect senior leaders to articulate the vision, but rely on line managers to translate it into personal relevance. Both layers must be aligned.
One of the most effective ways to reduce burnout is to involve people meaningfully. When people have a voice and help shape change, they’re more invested and better able to absorb the disruption. Create structured forums where concerns can be voiced without fear. High-trust environments result in employees being 2.6 times more capable of absorbing change.
As a leader, you must be ruthless about prioritisation. Transformation pressure naturally invites competing demands. Decide what must pause while new ways of working emerge. It is essential to be able to deprioritise “business as usual” when transformation peaks and communicate these choices clearly.
Small victories help sustain energy and provide tangible proof of progress. Recognising teams publicly for achieving milestones fuels morale and provides a narrative of collective achievement. Research by Bain shows that companies using aspirations rather than benchmarks to set goals (and celebrating progress toward those aspirations) maintained organisational energy more effectively.
You set the tone, so you must also guard your own resilience. That means setting boundaries, protecting time for rest, and crucially, building a network of support. As pressures mount, consider executive coaching or peer-group reflection to maintain perspective and prevent burnout.
The Role of Coaching and Reflection
Transformation leadership is highly demanding. Executives who engage in structured reflection whether through executive coaching, peer groups or mentorship, tend to lead with greater clarity and endurance.
One of the biggest mistakes executives can make in times of intense pressure is to cut out any activities they see as luxury and invest all their energy and time into the project as deadlines loom and inevitable complications arise.
The most confident, assured and effective leaders recognise the value of stepping back to allow both downtime – during which creativity can thrive, ideas can percolate and problem-solving can be more effective – and time for honest appraisal with a trusted and knowledgeable sounding board/mirror.
The latter will provide confidential space to test tricky decisions, process doubts and sustain strategic discipline. A coach helps you recognise when you’re pushing too hard or losing balance, and supports building a leadership practice that is resilient over a career, not just a single project or even position.
Research with successful transformation leaders (including CTOs at Dell Technologies, Desjardins, International Paper and global insurers) consistently finds that external perspective helps leaders maintain the energy required for multi-year change journeys. These leaders emphasise that energy needs to be cultivated and managed deliberately. Coaching provides structure for that discipline.
A few regular practices can materially improve transformation endurance:
Weekly priority reset: At the start of each week, pick three transformation-critical outcomes. Everything else is secondary. Successful transformations build change into the company’s operating rhythm rather than treating it as separate from normal business.
Frequent feedback loops: Hold fortnightly check-ins with key stakeholders and use them to engage with teams; gauge morale, anxieties, confidence and buy-in. This helps leaders spot the early signs of change fatigue: shorter tempers, physical exhaustion, increasing absence, falling energy and enthusiasm, rising anxiety and resistance, both active and passive. Praise individuals and teams when it is due but avoid singling them out for blame. Where things have gone wrong, explore what can be learned and invite feedback on how they can be improved.
Share progress through visual symbols: Use dashboards, graphs and other visual artefacts to mark smaller wins and track progress. Seeing movement and momentum builds hope and endurance. This is particularly important at the transformation midpoint, when energy is most likely to dip.
Built-in recovery: After major phases, intentionally pause for consolidation, learning and a reset. Encourage teams to reflect on what went well and how challenges were met. Companies achieving successful transformations treat change as continuous but rhythmic, with periods of intensity followed by consolidation.
Transformation is no longer episodic. It is a permanent feature of corporate life that is not delivered by intensity but by endurance. Leaders who guide their organisations through meaningful change without burning out their teams understand that pace, rhythm, and energy are strategic assets. They resist the lure of heroics, building ways of working that enable people to contribute at a high level without running on empty.
Leading for the long game means treating change as an ongoing capability, something that must be fuelled, protected, and renewed over time. This requires strategic clarity, psychological insight, disciplined prioritisation and the humility to recognise human limits. It calls for an operating rhythm that creates space for focus rather than overload, setting goals that stretch without overwhelming, and the deliberate management of organisational energy with the same seriousness applied to budgets and timelines.
The long-term value of getting this balance right is immense: resilient teams, meaningful capability uplift and the organisational stamina to transform again when the environment shifts.
If you are leading transformation now or planning one for 2026, this is the moment to invest in thoughtful design, purposeful communication, coaching and reflection. These are not ancillary, they are foundational to sustainable, repeatable success.
In this second part of our three-part series on upskilling for the AI era, we explore the distinct AI skills…
Building on our exploration of why executive minds need strategic downtime, the critical question becomes: how do you design a…
The paradox of executive leadership is stark: the more complex your responsibilities become, the more essential, yet elusive, true mental…
